

|

The International Writers Magazine:DVD Film
Titanic
(1997)
Director James Cameron
Rebecca Kingsbury
Titanic
is the biggest box-office film in movie history, grossing more
than one billion dollars worldwide. Winning eleven Oscars, seventy-three
other awards and forty-five nominations, James Camerons
picture is one of, if not the most famous film. Running over the
original budget of $200,000,000, its obvious that a lot
of money was spent on it, and in particular on making it authentic
and true to the well-known ship, but just how well spent was this
money?
|
|
When Cameron decided
to make a film about Titanic, a subject and story that is already so
well-known, he not only wanted to show the juxtaposition of rich and
poor, the gender roles of the early twentieth century played out till
death, but also the human face of this tragedy that occurred nearly
a century ago. He wanted to humanize it with two main characters
Rose and Jack. These fictitious characters are the audiences guides
through the tragic event and show us the mannerisms of the time as well
as showing through their eyes the class-ridden ship of dreams.
The authenticity started in twelve dives to photograph and film the
original ship. Cameron said, I knew not only that I must make
this film, but that in making it I had to film the real ship.
The images brought back were integrated into the film and possess an
undeniable emotional power because of the fact that they are real. From
these ghostly images came the realism of the film a rigorous
philosophy of absolute correctness permeated every department, from
set design and construction through decorating, props, wardrobe, hairdressing
and visual effects. Camerons determination to make Titanic
live again on film didnt just include researching thoroughly the
costumes and sets but also human behaviour the way people moved,
spoke, and their etiquette. Cameron took upon himself the responsibility
of history, the challenge of sorting out the information and misinformation
of the event, to portray it as truthfully as he could. Where the facts
werent clear, he made his own choices but he assures us that these
were conscious and well-informed decisions and not casual Hollywood
mistakes.
The second step towards complete authenticity was the building of the
ship. In Fox Studios Baja, a near full-size exterior ship was
erected in a seventeen-million-gallon oceanfront tank. This allowed
Cameron and his crew not only to sink the ship in a way true to history,
but also to build the intricate, elegant details of the ship, and whether
you noticed them or not, there are a lot of them. For the four and a
half days before the collision you spend a great deal of time exploring
the ship with first class Rose and third class passenger Jack, which
requires a vast level of specific detail, on such items as the iconic
oak carving clock at the top of the Grand Staircase where Rose and Jack
meet.
Cameron was so committed to detail that even the paintings in the film
are authentic. Picassos The Guitar Player was flown
in from the Musee National dArt Moderne in Paris to be displayed
in Roses suite. Most of the décor and interior of the ship
was reconstructed by, or under the supervision of, the original companies
that furnished the Titanic, from the carpet to the chandeliers. With
the professionals on board, how could the film be anything
but authentic?
Even the first-class dining room chairs were made exact replicas of
the furniture on the ship, as the set dresser Michael Ford jokes just
as stiff and uncomfortable as the originals.
The costumes are true to the fashion of 1912, from the smart bowler
hat, the epitome of style, and ornate-beaded period evening gowns of
the higher classes, to the flat-cap, dirty shirts and plain colours
of the steerage passengers.
With these details comes some dramatic license, as explained in the
credits. The fact that Rose and Jack ever meet on a ship that is physically
designed to prevent that happening, is a route taken with this license.
The added fact that they fall in love is another. The cross-class love
story is unlikely to have happened. The snobbish Rose, clean and proper,
together with Jack, the third class drifter, who probably wouldnt
bathe that often, if at all, is a challenging defiance of the strict
world around them. However, without this compelling love story, would
we feel so much for the passengers on board the ill-fated ship? Would
the film have the same humanizing effect? I dont think it would
and it is this effect that Cameron wanted to bring the Titanic to life
in a way that hadnt been done before.
The factual errors that appear in the film are hardly noticeable and
do not jeopardise its authenticity. The ownership and location
of some rooms are changed, for example the suite that Rose has was in
reality Bruce Ismays room, and the mater-at-arms office
where Jack is handcuffed is depicted as an exterior room with a porthole
when it was actually an interior room.
These small errors, although a Titanic scholar would notice, are not
important to the integrity of the film. How could they make a dip on
the authenticity of a film where the two million pound ship exterior
and interior sets, after being made almost complete replicas of the
original ship, are repeatedly sunk to film the ships end? Where
the Grand Staircase is destroyed by ninety thousand gallons of water
from overhead tanks, submerging the elegance in the cold Pacific Ocean?
Not only is this film authentic in the particulars, but in the destruction
of the ship.
Whether you liked this film or not, theres no denying the effort
and results on behalf of everyone that worked on it to make it as true
to the event as possible. Everything was researched, built, handcrafted
and displayed, right down to the White Star Line symbol on the serviettes.
Camerons complete dedication to this film is clear, even more
so as he sacrificed his $8 million directors salary and percentage
of the gross to make sure it was completed and released. The attention
he gave to the tiniest of details makes this film the most authentic
that I know of.
© Rebecca Kingsbury December 2005
Rebecca is an English and Creative Writing Major at the University of
Portsmouth
Dracula
- Take Two (1992)
Rebecca Kingsbury
More Reviews
in Film Space
Home
©
Hackwriters 1999-2005
all rights reserved - all comments are the writers' own responsibiltiy
- no liability accepted by hackwriters.com or affiliates.
|