|
|
|
|
|
|
World
Travel
Destinations
|
|
Dreamscapes
Original Fiction
|
Opinion
& Lifestyle
Politics & Living
|
|
|
Kid's
Books
Reviews & stories
|
|
|
|
|
The International Writers
Magazine:
DVD Review
The
Wild Bunch
Dan Schneider
Director
Sam Peckinpahs two hour and twenty-five minute long 1969
Western classic, The Wild Bunch, is certainly an influential
and important film, but, compared to the other great Western released
that year, Sergio Leones Once Upon A Time In The West,
it has not held up nearly as well.
|
|
There are several reasons for this fact, and by making that statement
I am not stating that Peckinpahs film is in any way a bad film.
No. Its merely a good film that has been passed by later films,
and lacks the depth Leones film still does. Part of the reason is
that Leones film is far more stylized and revolutionary. No, that
film is not nearly as violent as Peckinpahs, and it is the violence
of The Wild Bunch (and occasionally claims of its mainstreaming
slow motion cinematography mixed with quick cutting) that is usually the
lynchpin to arguments for its revolutionary status, not its more straightforward
and derivative storytelling; although the earlier Bonnie And Clyde,
by director Arthur Penn, deserves more of the credit (or blame) for mainstreaming
over the top and slow motion violence.
Compare the openings of the two films. In Peckinpahs film there
is the great opening montage where the heroes/villains are introduced,
and then the action is frozen into a black and white image. We see children
sadistically dropping scorpions on to red anthills, then setting the wee
creatures ablaze. Then we see the heroes, dressed as good guy American
soldiers become vicious killers as they rob a bank, then get in a shootout
with bounty hunters during a Temperance March. Leones film shows
almost nothing happen for the same amount of time. We see a train station
captured, and wait. This is visual poesy. Peckinpahs is prose, albeit
with tweaks.
Now consider the two leading men used as psychopathic killers. In Peckinpahs
film its William Holden, a second level leading man. But in Leones
film its Henry Fonda - one of Hollywoods towering filmic giants
of American decency. Leones choice is far more fundamentally disturbing.
Then there is the actual storylines of the films. For all the claims of
upsetting the apple cart, Peckinpahs tale is punctuated with numerous
poorly scripted scenes. There are numerous moments where the characters
in the gang simply do not speak realistically, and where they force laughter,
like at the end of a bad TV sitcom- theres the scene with the sauna,
with the whores, the scene where Angels villagers steal weapons
from the gang, and others. Leone has no such moments, and although there
is less actual violence in Leones films, there is nothing within
Peckinpahs film as primally shocking nor disconcerting as watching
Fondas character murder the whole McBain clan.
Again, dont get me wrong, there is much to recommend in Peckinpahs
film- individual moments, terrific performances by Holden and his rival,
Deke Thornton, played by Robert Ryan, but claims of its cinematic greatness
are overwrought and misplaced. Part of the problem comes from the hit
and miss screenplay by Walon Green, Roy N. Sickner, and Peckinpah. For
example, only the last four gang members are sharpshooters - who can kill
with ease and not be killed. Then there is the fact that the Mexicans
depicted are all criminally stereotyped. They cannot even put together
and shoot a machine gun. They need their German advisor to help them.
They are simpleminded greasers and banditos, and the Mexican women are
all faithless whores- even the Mexican gang members mother betrays
him. Another problem is why the straight shooting gang is even running
from Thornton and his idiotic bounty hunters. They could ambush and slaughter
them with ease. Also, much of the film, between the bravura start and
ending, excluding the famed train and bridge scenes, is far too long and
pointless, as well as dull. Once Upon A Time In The West, by contrast,
does not have a trivial moment in it.
The
film is set in 1913, during the Mexican Revolution. After the initial
shootout we follow the surviving members of the Wild Bunch - Pike
Bishop (Holden), Dutch Engstrom (Ernest Borgnine), Lyle and Tector
Gorch (Warren Oates and Ben Johnson), and Angel (Jaime Sanchez),
being pursued by a bunch of ragtag bounty hunters formed by railroad
honcho Patrick Harrigan (Albert Dekker). The top bounty hunter is
an ex-con named Deke Thornton (Ryan) whos gained his freedom
on the condition that he hunt down Bishop, a former colleague who
we learn betrayed him. The rest of Thorntons seriocomic band
are a bunch of cowards and liars. |
|
Despite the initial
imagery and carnage, it is when Bishop shoots one of the wounded gang
members, so that he wont slow them down, that we realize what a
heartless killer he is. Yet, this still does not have the shock of Fondas
murdering a family of innocents in Once Upon A Time In The West.
They meet up with an older gang member, Freddy Sykes (Edmond OBrien),
and nearly all go their own ways. It is Dutch who keeps the gang together,
even after they discover that the bags of loot they made off with were
merely steel washers, not coins. Through shared flashbacks of Bishop and
Thornton we learn some of their history- that Bishop abandoned Thornton
to be captured and sent to jail, and that Bishop was shot by a jealous
husband whose wife he was screwing.
The gang hits the native town of Angel, and we learn of the depredations
of a rebel Mexican general named Mapache (Emilio Fernandez), who is a
lesser rival to Pancho Villa. Mapache has killed Angels father and
cuckolded him with his woman. At a town called Agua Verde, Angel kills
his faithless girlfriend while in the arms of the General, and the gang
is almost obliterated by the soldiers. Instead, they are hired by the
General and his German advisors to steal an American arms shipment arriving
by train, just over the border in Texas. This leads to two of the films
most famed sequences: the first being the silent stealing of the train
car with the ammo, and then its being sent backwards along the rails to
smash into the train with the green Army recruits on it. The bounty hunters,
however, are in hot pursuit, but end up derailed when the gang blows up
the bridge crossing the Rio Grande to Mexico, the second famed sequence.
Mapaches men are beaten in a battle by Villas forces, and
are forced to negotiate for the arms from the gang. However, when the
last shipment is to be uncovered, as Angel and Dutch ride in for their
cuts, Mapache reveals that he knows about Angels stealing a shipment
of guns and ammunition for his villagers. Angel is caught, and Dutch cannot
do anything but ride off, as Angel is beaten, and dragged along the ground
behind Mapaches newfangled automobile. Waiting for Sykes to join
them, they see him ambushed by Thorntons bounty hunters.
The bounty hunters, too, are now outlaws, for the Army thought it was
them who stole the arms, and when they rode after the bounty hunters,
who were after the gang, there was a shootout in which the bounty hunters
killed several soldiers. More than ever, they need to come back with Bishop
and company. Bishop decides to try and rescue, or buy back Angel,
from Mapache. He refuses to release his prisoner, and the gang beds down
with whores for the afternoon. Later, Bishop, Dutch, and the Gorches take
a classic (or is it trite?) long Western walk into the center of town
to have a showdown with Mapache and demand Angels release. Mapache
has a flunky slash Angels throat. The gang shoots the flunky and
there is a standoff, as everyone is stunned at the turn of events. Then,
egged on by Dutch, Bishop guns down the German advisor to Mapache, and
the famed climactic shootout takes place. The gang is killed, but not
before slaughtering dozens of Mexican soldiers and innocents. Watching
this from a nearby hillside, Thornton and the bounty hunters wait awhile,
then swoop in to get the dead bodies. Thornton only takes Bishops
revolver (classic Western phallic symbolism), and sends the others back
to the States. He realizes he may be re-jailed by the duplicitous Harrigan
anyway. As he just sits outside the town, a few hours pass, and we see
Sykes ride up to him. The bounty hunters were ambushed and killed, and
Sykes invites him to join him in a new band of outlaws. Thornton reluctantly
assents, and heads back in to his old life, one he enjoyed more than what
weve seen him engaged in during this film.
Many critics have tried to decode all sorts of meaning into and out of
the film, such as its being a metaphor for the death of the Old West,
but it is not as resonant as that employed in Leones film, made
by a non-American, where capitalism and consumerism move in like vultures
by films end. In this film, we get a sentimentalized portrait of
the Old West, even down to the last shots where the gangs visages
reappear, all in moments of forced laughter. A good technique that Peckinpah
used, however, was having the Mexicans speak much Spanish, and without
subtitles. This means that closer attention must be paid to body language
and intonation. Yet, the film also indulges many classic Western
stereotypes. as mentioned, the gang members seem to be the only expert
marksmen. Time and again they survive against overwhelming odds, as their
opponents cannot seem to shoot straight, while they pick off bounty hunters
and Mexicans with ease, until only the sheer numbers against them eventually
do them in. Also, we get the trite trope of the gang somehow being noble
killers, even though they gun down innocents left and right- merely if
they get in the gangs way, while Mapache and the bounty hunters
are bad killers because they are simply not part of the gang-
the films focus. There is a famed scene where Bishop and Dutch debate
the value of a mans word. Dutch argues that it matters whom a word
is given to, not just that its given. This is the sort of bizarre
pseudo-ethics that all sorts of films that glorify killers- be they outlaws,
gangsters, or serial killers, indulge in. There are other little points
like this that litter the film, such as Bishop and Pike refusing to kill
each other when they have the chance, the melodramatic final march of
the superheroic white killers into Mapaches den of iniquity, and
on and on. Yet, weve already seen that the hypocritical Bishop does
not even live up to his own ethos. Earlier in the film he gunned down
a wounded gang member who would slow them down, then later rails against
the disgruntled Gorches that, When you side with a man, you stay
with him, and if you cant do that, youre some kind of animal,
youre finished. Were finished. All of us. Boy, theres
an honorable killer, right?
Some critics mislabeled this a tone poem or an epic,
two relentlessly overused words that do not apply. This film is too prosaic
for the former claim and too small in scope for the latter. It was beautifully
shot by cinematographer Lucien Ballard in a 2.35:1 aspect ratio, and the
Warner Brothers two disk DVD version of the film - The Original Directors
Cut, as advertised- is transferred and restored to flawlessness. It looks
like it was lensed last week. The score by Jerry Fielding is not nearly
as memorable, and not nearly as bold as the character driven theme songs
used in Leones superior film, even though it was nominated for an
Academy Award for original score. The screenplay, another weak spot, was
also nominated for an Oscar. The first disk has the film and a commentary
track by Peckinpah biographers/documentarians Nick Redman, Paul Seydor,
Garner Simmons, and David Weddle. It is not a good one, despite its participanys
love and passion for the film. They simply are not objective about many
of the films narrative and other flaws. It is simply a lovefest
praising Peckinpahs unflagging genius. Too much time is wasted in
critical fellatio and not enough is made on how many of the films
aspects have dated, nor how simplistic and shallow a film this is compared
to Leones film, or even another work where tensions between Americans
and Latin Americans is at a crux- the brilliant The Wages Of Fear,
by Henri-Georges Clouzot. This disk also has a trailer gallery of Peckinpah
films.
The second disk has additional scenes, outtakes, and three documentaries.
The first is Sam Peckinpahs West: Legacy Of A Hollywood Renegade,
which is a biography. Then there is The Wild Bunch: An Album In Montage,
which was nominated for a 1996 documentary Oscar, and then an excerpt
from Redmans documentary on the film, called A Simple Adventure
Story: Sam Peckinpah, Mexico And The Wild Bunch. These are all solid
extras, but none are standouts that give great insight into either Peckinpah
or the film.
The same is true with The Wild Bunch. Despite its reputation, this
overrated film gives no real insight into either the Old West nor the
human condition, and certainly nothing new. Too much of it, especially
in interior stage shots, and in some of the dialogue and forced laughter
between the gang members, feels like refried Bonanza, or other banal TV
Westerns of the era, whereas Leones Once Upon A Time In The West
was wholly original. Peckinpahs film is a good, but not great,
film, even if it is an enjoyable diversion for an afternoon, and was certainly
influential - just look at the final shot of Lyle Gorch at the machine
gun and there is an almost identical pose struck by James Franciscus at
the end of Beneath The Planet Of the Apes, released a year later.
If one goes into this film fresh, it will be an enjoyable film, a cut
above the simpleminded John Wayne tripe that dominated the silver screen
for the three decades prior, but if one expects a true masterpiece, disappointment
is bound to follow. Choose ignorance
.you know how the rest of that
saying goes. --
© Dan Schneider May 2007
www.Cosmoetica.com
Cosmoetica: The Best In Poetica
www.Cosmoetica.com/Cinemension.htm
Cinemension: Film's Extra Dimension
More Reviews
Home
©
Hackwriters 1999-2007
all rights reserved - all comments are the writers' own responsibiltiy
- no liability accepted by hackwriters.com or affiliates.
|